Cold Case Investigations A Review

Hi all,Yearn term readers of this blog soul be aware that one of my current research projects is the go over of earlier period Australian UFO cases. Recurrently with the sound of time, new details intensification, or to be had details receive clarification. Today's technology, with Google maps; Google fashion view; permission to scanned copies of old push and diary articles, and email contact with other researchers allows unprecedented opportunities to go over data.In recent era, I control reviewed the associates Australian UFO cases:1. Eton Projection, Qld 24 May 1965. Click within. 2. Heyfield, Vic 24 Apr 1968. Click within. 3. Wittenoom, WA 2 Aug 1964. Click within. 4. Mt Gillen, NT Jan 1954.Click within. 5. SA/WA divan Easter 1954. Click within. 6. Canberra, ACT 15 Jul 1965. Click within. 7. Minderoo Duct 25 Oct 1910. Click within. 8. Zanthus, WA 22 Aug 1968. Click within. OUTCOMES: I control managed to stumble on existing in the RAAF's UFO files (Heyfield and Wittenoom); facing lost magazine articles (Mt Gillen and Zanthus); pad down a details after 43 existence (Zanthus); reviewed weather and from head to foot data which no-one else had undertaken ( Minderoo Duct); and stumble on magazine articles which few populace knew existed (Plympton and Eton Projection). All of this research, provided in masses instances, new insights happening a case. Here were anomalies in stories (SA/WA divan, and Mt Gillen); hollowness in usually cited dates (Minderoo Duct); standby data (Wittenoon and Heyfield); which led, upon outlook, in masses cases, to a conflicting commentary to that found in the UFO copy. Am I categorical in my revised conclusions? Yes, to the same degree they are based on aloof data points. That is, the secret. I do not go happening a crunchy case outlook with any preconceived conclusions. My upshot are based on a re-analysis of the data I control gathered. I was as amazed as qualities, to track down that the classical CE1 report from Wittenoom in 1964, was probably a vivid meteor. The first hand details report forms buried on RAAF UFO files, buried billow data upon which to base this thoughts. The Easter 1954 classical photographic case from the SA/WA divan, crush to pieces once you reread the different magazine story.Modify OF STATUS?Is supply a revised thoughts and removing a classical UFO case from that continuance, a reliable exercise? I importance it is. It gives me very faithfulness in the cases which pass a crunchy case go over, and tranquil put down roots unfathomable. You soul citation, nevertheless, that the batch of cases which put down roots unfathomable after go over is insignificant.My distinctive assumption, is that the "core" UFO phenomenon, (i.e. the unfathomable cases), is a great deal rarer than most UFO researchers contain. The same as masses researchers organized that the inflowing raw reports to unfathomable after outlook case ratio is about 100/5, I make up your mind that the ratio is very physical 100/1.A CONCERN:One aspect of the crunchy case reviewing, which concerns me, is that other Australian researchers are not contract this type of research.I organized that you do part of an empire to use up time tracking down existing in such chairs as the Central Documentation of Australia's on-line magazine organized, and the digitised (or not) files of the Central Archives of Australia; but these can be ended from the lessen of your own win and at any time of the day. You do both part of an empire to stumble on old magazine articles. Quite a few of these, such as a want run of MUFON Journals and all the NICAP "The UFO Researcher" are uncomplicatedly almost on-line. Quite a few magazines are in collections with such general agencies as the many Hand Libraries. Quite a few control come to me by communicating with man Australian UFO researchers and their ache in prize time to dig happening their distinctive or group's UFO magazine collections and delivery with me. In recognition achievable contact details of witnesses to old cases you soul part of an empire to read quickly straightforward copies of old electoral rolls which can be dehydrated.Let your imagination run riot if a dozen populace were to remove on crunchy case investigations. The hundreds of old Australian cases which cry out for a go over, possibly will be tackled in say smaller quantity than a see. Such as would that devote us? It would leave us with a make equal reviewed organized of good "unknowns." This organized would afterward form a issue for a better characteristic read quickly at patterns in the data. Would any readers of this blog practically to packed in?A DISCLAIMER:By and large, as others do, I devise mistakes in my interpretations, or contribute an fictitious resolve of data. I soir convinced contempt, or data authority from blog readers.IN SUMMARY:I read quickly talk to, as my time permits, to perpetual my crunchy case reviews on earlier period Australian cases, and bringing you my upshot.