A Reply To Dr Kevin Randle Critique Of Exopolitics

In the cover of impartiality, and to the same extent memo describe is an fault-finding period of UFO research, I invited Dr. Michael Salla to retort to my explanation on Exopolitics. Supervision is the unedited communiqu that Dr. Salla impending. KDR Dr Kevin Randle, has bent a well judged critique of my protection on whistleblower testimonies as a motive for success to the truth about the UFO cover up and the extraterrestrial hypothesis (see "Exopolitics", 18 November 2006, http://www.kevinrandle.blogspot.com/ ). Dr Randle (whichever a Essential in the Iowa Status Lookout) is on the detail that the Roswell crash happened and that a follower cover up of UFO and extraterrestrial together evidence exists. At a standstill, he believes that other than the Roswell case but whistleblower testimonies gobble been methodically vetted, and underlying evidence analyzed, that offering is not passable influential evidence to furnish other whistleblower claims of UFO crashes and cover up of extraterrestrial technologies and entities. So Dr Randle cannot be dismissed as cold to the claims of a Gigantic Watergate and the dedication of whistleblower testimonies, it's plainly that in his attend to these acquire to be one by one verified by suite evidence and passage as the motive for decent research. So he has habitually attempted to set-up a very high evidentiary usual but all claims and album details of a whistleblower acquire to inspection out in delegate for the describe to be set as decent. If it is found, for classical, that a whistleblower has blown up a period of their try detail or describe, after that their very great describe dressed in UFO crashes, extraterrestrial entities or technologies, becomes essential.In his critique but he specifically focuses on my regularity to exopolitics research, Dr Randle identifies four whistleblowers that I use as the fundamental anchors in my research and analyses: Master Sgt Clifford Building material, Command Sgt Essential Robert Dean, Lt Col Philip Corso and Bob Lazar. In scale these whistleblowers, all of whom I infer to be influential, Dr Randle requirements to show the hitch of through testimonies that are in his attend to essential and analyzing the follower implications of these testimonies in a new art called exopolitics. He believes that through essential testimonies in this way leads to a suitably twisted conceptual frame for plan the UFO phenomenon and the extraterrestrial hypothesis. He concludes his critique taking into consideration the far-reaching statement: "In other chatter, isn't it time for the proponents of exopolitics to favorably vet the backgrounds and the tales of the whistleblowers a bit than candidly maintain them? Isn't time for us to halt embracing one elephant we are told that appeals to us candidly to the same extent it appeals to us? Shouldn't we more willingly search to become aware of the truth in a area taking into consideration the voices of the charlatans emerge to torrential rain out the voices of box."I reflect on Dr Randle is positively respectable in his end that the backgrounds and stories of whistleblowers gobble to be vetted a bit than candidly fortified. At a standstill, this straight off pushy acquaint with takes us voguish three very difficult market issues to the same degree it comes to showing whistleblower testimonies. Sooner, what portico ideals acquire to be calibrate in showing whistleblower testimonies? Flaunt, what investigatory ideals destitution be usual of persons showing whistleblower testimonies? Last of all, what national assure processes contextualize the showing of whistleblower testimonies?As far as the first market claim is unsettled, Dr Randle advocates as a very full and comprehensive study of whistleblower claims, evidence and album to inspection for inescapability and reality. If the whistleblower fails to be long-term and seal, after that the describe is considered essential and either dismissed or put voguish the established cloudy box. I determination representation Dr Randle's structure as the "miserable showing regularity". On the other hand, offering is a supervisor 'nuanced' or 'whistleblower cheery regularity to showing whistleblower testimonies but as hope as fixed portico criteria are met after that whistleblower describe can be set as influential consecutive if a few inconsistencies or inaccuracies are found.The update market claim is supervisor difficult at the same time as Dr Randle assumes that this is candidly a belongings of neutral investigators outlook in taking into consideration a miserable showing regularity and firm this on whistleblower testimonies. In disagree, I dispute that investigators acquire to be gentle to the national assure implications of whistleblowers outlook pushy to grid unofficial disclosures of classified information. This means asking questions that are quite nuanced and gentle to the achievable penalties faced by whistleblowers in telling classified information. This means that persons loot a miserable showing regularity may be asking the not the done thing questions of whistleblowers, and accordingly get short answers or an pending picture of what is taking place. I gobble described in a downcast paper, ten examples of the not the done thing questions asked by investigators to the same degree interviewing whistleblowers disclosing classified information (see: http://www.exopolitics.org/Exo-Comment-30.htm ). Of course, researchers are free to regular or wrangle taking into consideration my list of ten questions to ask/not to ask whistleblowers. The fault-finding feature is that offering is a difficult market feature tangled in the neighborhood at the same time as offering are severe penalties for disclosing unofficial information that acquire to be considered to the same degree it comes to the showing of whistleblowers.Last of all, this takes me to the third and most bring up market issue: the national assure processes that contextualize whistleblower testimonies. Acquaint with is usually submit among most UFO investigators in the midst of Dr Randle that a Gigantic Watergate exists. Acquaint with is engorge dissection, other than, over the mass to which this Gigantic Watergate contextualizes the data determined market and the showing of whistleblower testimonies. A number of such as Dr Randle would dispute that Gigantic Watergate involves daintily the withholding of classified information; and that claims of evidence tampering, knocking down and manufacture, are not supported by the evidence. On the other hand, some researchers (in the midst of myself) dispute that evidence tampering, etc., is an fault-finding period of the national assure system concurrent taking into consideration Gigantic Watergate. I affix this on a list of ten ways in which the national assure system is meant to salt away unofficial disclosure of suitably classified information dressed in the extraterrestrial hypothesis and UFOs (see http://www.exopolitics.org/Exo-Comment-32.htm ).Moreover of the three market issues I've identified manner on the showing ideals that destitution be second hand for said whistleblowers disclosing classified information dressed in extraterrestrial technologies or extraterrestrial native entities. I certainly don't regular taking into consideration the showing version advocated by Dr Randle which in my attend to is too miserable, and have a break to sufficiently place voguish elucidation the national assure implications of whistleblowers disclosing unofficial information. At the self-same time, offering is a acquire not to at ease whistleblower describe at face grasp and so some showing is obligated in delegate to forget charlatans and frauds as Dr Randle is acceptably unsettled about. Considered opinion the only this minute showing ideals in my attend to requires later than all three market questions to the same degree it comes to showing and certainly requires persons feat the showing being sensitized to the national assure implications for one and all whistleblower being investigated. I infer that the showing ideals I gobble second hand pack the nominal portico in vocabulary of the whistleblower being extensively interviewed by adroit researchers, their military try or industry try detail being corroborated, neutral witnesses interviewed, residential home inescapability of their claims, all circumstantial evidence tartan, etc.I determination now without delay retort to the inconsistencies or inaccuracies in the testimonies tapering out by Dr Randle in his critique of the four whistleblowers he cites: Building material, Dean, Corso and Lazar. I reflect on that Dr Randle has tapering to positive inconsistencies or inaccuracies in the testimonies of these whistleblowers that in his attend to forget the logicality of their testimonies. I gobble had a brains taking into consideration Dr Randle on these whistleblowers on end occasions but we gobble non-operational voguish supervisor details in arguments moreover for and adjacent to their credibility (see http://groups.yahoo.com/group/exopolitics/message/158 )In the case of Clifford Building material for classical, he points to Sgt Stone's 22 year military try detail as not underlying Stone's supplicate of having been surreptitiously certified for finest UFO seizure teams, and that he morally was certified as an decision-making typist. Building material claims that his try detail never included his timber live out and consecutive his put robust officers were not through acquainted of his timber try that he was on the sly summoned to do. I be made aware Stone's claims to be very safe and in fact consider what I be made aware a very satisfactory way of solid up a timber UFO seizure system in the sphere of the put military system but effective assure is maintained by restricting comprehension to morally persons feat the timber try. A system but Stone's put robust politician is not in the loop is long-term taking into consideration immeasurable testimonies but aloof military and follower officials are not on the ball. This is certainly a satisfactory significance of a Gigantic Watergate so I be made aware Stone's views plausible; and his artlessness, inescapability and commitment to detail in interviews taking into consideration myself and other investigators leads to my shut that he is influential. A flow of adroit researchers gobble extensively interviewed Building material and become aware of him to be influential. For supervisor on the other points discussed by Dr Randle and myself, delight go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/exopolitics/message/218In the case of Robert Dean, Dr Randle points to the cavalier way in which Sgt Dean was given the said Assessment detailing UFO/extraterrestrial visitations and the presage they posed to NATO. He argues adjacent to the plausibility of a such a top secret document being handled in that way, and the flash problem in proving the existence of such a document by Timothy In a good way. In spite of everything, it is a belongings of the community detail that Dean did task in the Eventual Headquarter of the Interconnected Powers in Europe (Alter) and served in the Eventual First city Operations Nucleus (SHOC). So Dean served in the crown of the military clout system for NATO in Europe and was in a lead to attend to such a document if it existed. Detailed the massive data underlying a UFO vision, it is positively satisfactory to gather round that NATO did allow a top secret study of the achievable presage posed by UFOs and any visiting extraterrestrials. If such a study was commissioned, after that one or supervisor copies would gobble been in the SHOC as Dean described. Detailed his dignified 27 year military try and government effort, offering is no box to infer that Dean would make up such a story. He was in the only this minute allow and time but such a classified NATO study would gobble been formal and analyzed by aloof NATO military officers. He would be an classical of assistant who meets the nominal portico criteria for whistleblower credibility.This place me to the case of Col Corso who continues to be dismissed by UFO researchers for it would seem embellishing his try detail by claiming to work in the Status Picket Council as gross to the under good-looking Operations Coordinating End that reported to the NSC. Into the open, he has been criticized for claiming to be the head of the Peculiar Equipment List at Military Appraise and Thorny for two duration, to the same degree his try detail states he was morally in this lead for three months. In Dr Randle's views, these flourishes grid Corso's describe essential. I gobble argued dazed that an neutral FBI report declared that Corso served in the Operations Logic End Status Picket Council thereby answering critics such as Brad Sparks who supplicate that the OCB was not period of the NSC preceding to 1957 and Corso knowingly blown up his album. As for his military detail stating he was head of the Peculiar Equipment List for three months a bit than the two duration he claimed, offering are a flow of safe explanations for this divergence such as the steadfast crushing personality of the Military red tape, but no box to refuse to give that Corso was a trusted secondary of Lt Native Arthur Trudeau who gave Corso the special plan ahead he claimed and expedited the market whereby Corso may possibly happen the timber duties assigned to him regardless. The recent describe by Paul Hellyer, has-been Canadian Keep up High priest, but he claims an modest retired USAF Native upbeat Corso's claims, suggests that these darken inconsistencies do not in any way manner on the dedication of Corso's central claims dressed in the transmission of ET technology voguish the city dweller section. Over, I would dispute he meets the portico criteria for whistleblower credibility.This takes me towards the end to Bob Lazar who has been vilified by common UFO researchers for his claims to gobble worked at S4 on the wind back manufacturing of extraterrestrial vehicles. Acquaint with are a flow of inconsistencies tapering out by researchers such as Stan Friedman dressed in Lazar's describe, but offering continues to be strong furnish for Lazar from influential investigators such as George Knapp. Knapp and his investigatory bell gobble been able to, for classical, keep up that the W2 impending by Lazar was as it should be and that he did genuinely work at the Meson post at Los Alamos, and that other Los Alamos people were given terrorization not to lecture Lazar's effort. Best pointer of Lazar rests on the absence of evidence of him completing two masters degrees, yet it is suitably improbable that assistant would work at a good-looking post at such as Meson Point Competence not good enough having at smallest possible fulfill a Bachelor's level. It is very sincere that, as I and others gobble argued, his hypothetical and effort credentials were separated as period of the assure dealings in allow for him active at S4 and/or for minimizing the manner of his disclosure gone he became a whistleblower. In shut, one and all of the four whistleblowers gobble been extensively investigated and offering continues to be strong furnish for their credibility by a flow of adroit researchers. If one attempts a showing market that is based on the three market issues I gobble described mega, I infer that one and all of the four whistleblowers would sprint a pretty good portico of credibility to forget achievable charlatans and ensuring whistleblowers taking into consideration high credibility ascend. As a youngster of sloppy the testimonies of these whistleblowers, substantial advance can be through in plan the personality of the national assure system that has been produced to control Gigantic Watergate. That is the motive of the exopolitical model I use in feat my own research on the follower implications of the extraterrestrial vision.I be made aware a miserable showing regularity to whistleblower testimonies acting voguish the hands of persons scarce to perpetuate Gigantic Watergate by intrusive taking into consideration the evidence and passage that is cited by whistleblowers or second hand to fathom their credibility. This habitually leads to the pointer that whistleblowers who supplicate that suite evidence and passage has been separated that would know for certain their claims are age bracket claims that can't be deceptive (as in Karl Popper's 'falsifiablitiy tabloid) and accordingly one moves out of the scientific ring voguish the ring of consign. In disagree, this pointer can be turned on its head at the same time as it is a belongings of consign to infer that a guiltlessly unbiased scientific market can be second hand in a area twisted by national assure processes but suite evidence and passage is separated or untouched. This is an fault-finding market feature that whistleblower testimonies force researchers to due, albeit taking into consideration engorge qualm as evidenced by Dr Randle's critique. I excluding thank Dr Randle for carriage his critique and caring me an motivate to door, and explain the truth of my exopolitical regularity to whistleblower describe.In treatyMichael Salla