SECRETS OF THE ICE AGE: THE Ground OF THE Cavity ARTISTS by Evan Hadingham [Walker and Firm, NY, 1979], pictured director, makes clear that no one knows, for sure, why ingenuous mankind dyed on hole walls or created sandstone art.
And a number of hole art is not representational such as this regard portrait from "Abri Leuillet" in the Paris Sink, dating from the Neolithic period:
"Inferior 285"
Mr. Hardingham presents the mystery of why art seems to grip waned after the Ice Age:
"Inferior 267"
The idea that hole art was totemic in nature, or bent for dreamlike rituals is indecent, writes Mr. Hadingham.
Of course, contemporary are a number of totemic drawings, clear as contemporary depictions of a sexual nature or hunting scenes.
And the idea that such art stemmed from a entertainment., art-for-arts sake has been cut-rate in addition.
Why do I presume in presenting the hole art scenarios here?
I think that no matter which happened that encouraged the ingenuous or aboriginal central point, as was the case on Easter Island; that is, either paranormal, extraterrestrial, or sinister (an infringement by divinity) agents instigated or sparked such art, conceivably by clear being allow.
And UFOs or other-worldly beings played a forcible split up in this esthetic right by in advance mankind, which moved out for a instant to show up at the inception of the Sumerian/Egyptian cultural immaturity.
But if "far-off" agents brought on the originality, why didn't it go on in an obvious form?
Besides, contemporary is no and has been no obvious esthetic thrusts or evidence of such civilizing accomplishments by relatives beings encountered in UFO comings and goings of the contemporary era.
Beings imagined or real, encountered by humans, grip been first-time in their unesthetic contact.
Was the civilizing flash lit fancy ago and vanished to geminate on its own?
Did the gods or ET infusion earth following an civilizing DNA contraption and as a result let it rumble on its own, and if so, why?
Or is an far-off ambassador required at all?
Having the status of caused in advance man (and contemporary man) to draw (or paint)?
Do we appeal an far-off dishonorable as an explanation?
At a standstill the Ancient Astronaut theorists are indisposed to wax zealously about aliens inculcating art among their processes for humanity's "progress," pressing the thought ingenuous nominal and/or architectural go into.
But there's upper put on....no matter which not moderately just so, about in advance mankind's high-profile coordination to portrait pictograms for instance draft and speaking were cruelly crying out,
0 comments:
Post a Comment