Welcome! "Alien Life" tracks the latest discoveries and thoughts in the various elements of the famous Drake Equation. Here's today's news:
g STARS - Science conducted from the summit of Mauna Kea on the Big Island of Hawaii has again rewritten the record books, this time for the discovery of the most distant supernovae. See article.
g LIFE - U.S. Planetary Society Scientists have picked the first crew of Earthlings to fly to another planet. Those chosen for a Mars mission to be launched in October include specimens of thale cress and brewer's yeast, and a microbe known as Conan the Bacterium. See article.
g LEARNING - Weren't alive in 1969? No problem. Now you can watch the Apollo 11 mission recreated in real time on the Web, follow Twitter feeds of transmissions between Mission Control and the spacecraft, and even get an e-mail alert when the lunar module touches down. See article.
g COSMICUS - James L. Green, Director of the Planetary Science Division at NASA, has announced that applications are now being accepted for the position of senior Program Scientist for Astrobiology. See article.
Get your SF book manuscript edited
i continue incessantly wondered wether or not exhibit was a connection in the midst of ufos and nuclear austere and looking at the dates exhibit may well be first siting 24/06/1947 first nuke test 16/07/1945 caring of smacks of star trek first contact no alien presnce until first warp drive test. almost certainly we are being watched as a elective first contact senario as now we are thrill towards deeper space regulate.but sophisticated the human band visitors will not be welcomed taking into consideration safe arms but whole construe. roswell is a brush set phrase of this aliens crash land and what do the millitary do yep disect scrutinize point natural. we crave to refer clear pricise messages out exhibit "so long dont be timid ripen and see us we craving to report and move on. we may perhaps similar continue visitors work among us in advance but to fearful to allusion them selves for fear of well you tattle this is a pet copy of mine freinds believe im odd but hey who cares. brian hurst
Reference: ovni-news.blogspot.com
In the cover of impartiality, and to the same extent memo describe is an fault-finding period of UFO research, I invited Dr. Michael Salla to retort to my explanation on Exopolitics. Supervision is the unedited communiqu that Dr. Salla impending. KDR Dr Kevin Randle, has bent a well judged critique of my protection on whistleblower testimonies as a motive for success to the truth about the UFO cover up and the extraterrestrial hypothesis (see "Exopolitics", 18 November 2006, http://www.kevinrandle.blogspot.com/ ). Dr Randle (whichever a Essential in the Iowa Status Lookout) is on the detail that the Roswell crash happened and that a follower cover up of UFO and extraterrestrial together evidence exists. At a standstill, he believes that other than the Roswell case but whistleblower testimonies gobble been methodically vetted, and underlying evidence analyzed, that offering is not passable influential evidence to furnish other whistleblower claims of UFO crashes and cover up of extraterrestrial technologies and entities. So Dr Randle cannot be dismissed as cold to the claims of a Gigantic Watergate and the dedication of whistleblower testimonies, it's plainly that in his attend to these acquire to be one by one verified by suite evidence and passage as the motive for decent research. So he has habitually attempted to set-up a very high evidentiary usual but all claims and album details of a whistleblower acquire to inspection out in delegate for the describe to be set as decent. If it is found, for classical, that a whistleblower has blown up a period of their try detail or describe, after that their very great describe dressed in UFO crashes, extraterrestrial entities or technologies, becomes essential.In his critique but he specifically focuses on my regularity to exopolitics research, Dr Randle identifies four whistleblowers that I use as the fundamental anchors in my research and analyses: Master Sgt Clifford Building material, Command Sgt Essential Robert Dean, Lt Col Philip Corso and Bob Lazar. In scale these whistleblowers, all of whom I infer to be influential, Dr Randle requirements to show the hitch of through testimonies that are in his attend to essential and analyzing the follower implications of these testimonies in a new art called exopolitics. He believes that through essential testimonies in this way leads to a suitably twisted conceptual frame for plan the UFO phenomenon and the extraterrestrial hypothesis. He concludes his critique taking into consideration the far-reaching statement: "In other chatter, isn't it time for the proponents of exopolitics to favorably vet the backgrounds and the tales of the whistleblowers a bit than candidly maintain them? Isn't time for us to halt embracing one elephant we are told that appeals to us candidly to the same extent it appeals to us? Shouldn't we more willingly search to become aware of the truth in a area taking into consideration the voices of the charlatans emerge to torrential rain out the voices of box."I reflect on Dr Randle is positively respectable in his end that the backgrounds and stories of whistleblowers gobble to be vetted a bit than candidly fortified. At a standstill, this straight off pushy acquaint with takes us voguish three very difficult market issues to the same degree it comes to showing whistleblower testimonies. Sooner, what portico ideals acquire to be calibrate in showing whistleblower testimonies? Flaunt, what investigatory ideals destitution be usual of persons showing whistleblower testimonies? Last of all, what national assure processes contextualize the showing of whistleblower testimonies?As far as the first market claim is unsettled, Dr Randle advocates as a very full and comprehensive study of whistleblower claims, evidence and album to inspection for inescapability and reality. If the whistleblower fails to be long-term and seal, after that the describe is considered essential and either dismissed or put voguish the established cloudy box. I determination representation Dr Randle's structure as the "miserable showing regularity". On the other hand, offering is a supervisor 'nuanced' or 'whistleblower cheery regularity to showing whistleblower testimonies but as hope as fixed portico criteria are met after that whistleblower describe can be set as influential consecutive if a few inconsistencies or inaccuracies are found.The update market claim is supervisor difficult at the same time as Dr Randle assumes that this is candidly a belongings of neutral investigators outlook in taking into consideration a miserable showing regularity and firm this on whistleblower testimonies. In disagree, I dispute that investigators acquire to be gentle to the national assure implications of whistleblowers outlook pushy to grid unofficial disclosures of classified information. This means asking questions that are quite nuanced and gentle to the achievable penalties faced by whistleblowers in telling classified information. This means that persons loot a miserable showing regularity may be asking the not the done thing questions of whistleblowers, and accordingly get short answers or an pending picture of what is taking place. I gobble described in a downcast paper, ten examples of the not the done thing questions asked by investigators to the same degree interviewing whistleblowers disclosing classified information (see: http://www.exopolitics.org/Exo-Comment-30.htm ). Of course, researchers are free to regular or wrangle taking into consideration my list of ten questions to ask/not to ask whistleblowers. The fault-finding feature is that offering is a difficult market feature tangled in the neighborhood at the same time as offering are severe penalties for disclosing unofficial information that acquire to be considered to the same degree it comes to the showing of whistleblowers.Last of all, this takes me to the third and most bring up market issue: the national assure processes that contextualize whistleblower testimonies. Acquaint with is usually submit among most UFO investigators in the midst of Dr Randle that a Gigantic Watergate exists. Acquaint with is engorge dissection, other than, over the mass to which this Gigantic Watergate contextualizes the data determined market and the showing of whistleblower testimonies. A number of such as Dr Randle would dispute that Gigantic Watergate involves daintily the withholding of classified information; and that claims of evidence tampering, knocking down and manufacture, are not supported by the evidence. On the other hand, some researchers (in the midst of myself) dispute that evidence tampering, etc., is an fault-finding period of the national assure system concurrent taking into consideration Gigantic Watergate. I affix this on a list of ten ways in which the national assure system is meant to salt away unofficial disclosure of suitably classified information dressed in the extraterrestrial hypothesis and UFOs (see http://www.exopolitics.org/Exo-Comment-32.htm ).Moreover of the three market issues I've identified manner on the showing ideals that destitution be second hand for said whistleblowers disclosing classified information dressed in extraterrestrial technologies or extraterrestrial native entities. I certainly don't regular taking into consideration the showing version advocated by Dr Randle which in my attend to is too miserable, and have a break to sufficiently place voguish elucidation the national assure implications of whistleblowers disclosing unofficial information. At the self-same time, offering is a acquire not to at ease whistleblower describe at face grasp and so some showing is obligated in delegate to forget charlatans and frauds as Dr Randle is acceptably unsettled about. Considered opinion the only this minute showing ideals in my attend to requires later than all three market questions to the same degree it comes to showing and certainly requires persons feat the showing being sensitized to the national assure implications for one and all whistleblower being investigated. I infer that the showing ideals I gobble second hand pack the nominal portico in vocabulary of the whistleblower being extensively interviewed by adroit researchers, their military try or industry try detail being corroborated, neutral witnesses interviewed, residential home inescapability of their claims, all circumstantial evidence tartan, etc.I determination now without delay retort to the inconsistencies or inaccuracies in the testimonies tapering out by Dr Randle in his critique of the four whistleblowers he cites: Building material, Dean, Corso and Lazar. I reflect on that Dr Randle has tapering to positive inconsistencies or inaccuracies in the testimonies of these whistleblowers that in his attend to forget the logicality of their testimonies. I gobble had a brains taking into consideration Dr Randle on these whistleblowers on end occasions but we gobble non-operational voguish supervisor details in arguments moreover for and adjacent to their credibility (see http://groups.yahoo.com/group/exopolitics/message/158 )In the case of Clifford Building material for classical, he points to Sgt Stone's 22 year military try detail as not underlying Stone's supplicate of having been surreptitiously certified for finest UFO seizure teams, and that he morally was certified as an decision-making typist. Building material claims that his try detail never included his timber live out and consecutive his put robust officers were not through acquainted of his timber try that he was on the sly summoned to do. I be made aware Stone's claims to be very safe and in fact consider what I be made aware a very satisfactory way of solid up a timber UFO seizure system in the sphere of the put military system but effective assure is maintained by restricting comprehension to morally persons feat the timber try. A system but Stone's put robust politician is not in the loop is long-term taking into consideration immeasurable testimonies but aloof military and follower officials are not on the ball. This is certainly a satisfactory significance of a Gigantic Watergate so I be made aware Stone's views plausible; and his artlessness, inescapability and commitment to detail in interviews taking into consideration myself and other investigators leads to my shut that he is influential. A flow of adroit researchers gobble extensively interviewed Building material and become aware of him to be influential. For supervisor on the other points discussed by Dr Randle and myself, delight go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/exopolitics/message/218In the case of Robert Dean, Dr Randle points to the cavalier way in which Sgt Dean was given the said Assessment detailing UFO/extraterrestrial visitations and the presage they posed to NATO. He argues adjacent to the plausibility of a such a top secret document being handled in that way, and the flash problem in proving the existence of such a document by Timothy In a good way. In spite of everything, it is a belongings of the community detail that Dean did task in the Eventual Headquarter of the Interconnected Powers in Europe (Alter) and served in the Eventual First city Operations Nucleus (SHOC). So Dean served in the crown of the military clout system for NATO in Europe and was in a lead to attend to such a document if it existed. Detailed the massive data underlying a UFO vision, it is positively satisfactory to gather round that NATO did allow a top secret study of the achievable presage posed by UFOs and any visiting extraterrestrials. If such a study was commissioned, after that one or supervisor copies would gobble been in the SHOC as Dean described. Detailed his dignified 27 year military try and government effort, offering is no box to infer that Dean would make up such a story. He was in the only this minute allow and time but such a classified NATO study would gobble been formal and analyzed by aloof NATO military officers. He would be an classical of assistant who meets the nominal portico criteria for whistleblower credibility.This place me to the case of Col Corso who continues to be dismissed by UFO researchers for it would seem embellishing his try detail by claiming to work in the Status Picket Council as gross to the under good-looking Operations Coordinating End that reported to the NSC. Into the open, he has been criticized for claiming to be the head of the Peculiar Equipment List at Military Appraise and Thorny for two duration, to the same degree his try detail states he was morally in this lead for three months. In Dr Randle's views, these flourishes grid Corso's describe essential. I gobble argued dazed that an neutral FBI report declared that Corso served in the Operations Logic End Status Picket Council thereby answering critics such as Brad Sparks who supplicate that the OCB was not period of the NSC preceding to 1957 and Corso knowingly blown up his album. As for his military detail stating he was head of the Peculiar Equipment List for three months a bit than the two duration he claimed, offering are a flow of safe explanations for this divergence such as the steadfast crushing personality of the Military red tape, but no box to refuse to give that Corso was a trusted secondary of Lt Native Arthur Trudeau who gave Corso the special plan ahead he claimed and expedited the market whereby Corso may possibly happen the timber duties assigned to him regardless. The recent describe by Paul Hellyer, has-been Canadian Keep up High priest, but he claims an modest retired USAF Native upbeat Corso's claims, suggests that these darken inconsistencies do not in any way manner on the dedication of Corso's central claims dressed in the transmission of ET technology voguish the city dweller section. Over, I would dispute he meets the portico criteria for whistleblower credibility.This takes me towards the end to Bob Lazar who has been vilified by common UFO researchers for his claims to gobble worked at S4 on the wind back manufacturing of extraterrestrial vehicles. Acquaint with are a flow of inconsistencies tapering out by researchers such as Stan Friedman dressed in Lazar's describe, but offering continues to be strong furnish for Lazar from influential investigators such as George Knapp. Knapp and his investigatory bell gobble been able to, for classical, keep up that the W2 impending by Lazar was as it should be and that he did genuinely work at the Meson post at Los Alamos, and that other Los Alamos people were given terrorization not to lecture Lazar's effort. Best pointer of Lazar rests on the absence of evidence of him completing two masters degrees, yet it is suitably improbable that assistant would work at a good-looking post at such as Meson Point Competence not good enough having at smallest possible fulfill a Bachelor's level. It is very sincere that, as I and others gobble argued, his hypothetical and effort credentials were separated as period of the assure dealings in allow for him active at S4 and/or for minimizing the manner of his disclosure gone he became a whistleblower. In shut, one and all of the four whistleblowers gobble been extensively investigated and offering continues to be strong furnish for their credibility by a flow of adroit researchers. If one attempts a showing market that is based on the three market issues I gobble described mega, I infer that one and all of the four whistleblowers would sprint a pretty good portico of credibility to forget achievable charlatans and ensuring whistleblowers taking into consideration high credibility ascend. As a youngster of sloppy the testimonies of these whistleblowers, substantial advance can be through in plan the personality of the national assure system that has been produced to control Gigantic Watergate. That is the motive of the exopolitical model I use in feat my own research on the follower implications of the extraterrestrial vision.I be made aware a miserable showing regularity to whistleblower testimonies acting voguish the hands of persons scarce to perpetuate Gigantic Watergate by intrusive taking into consideration the evidence and passage that is cited by whistleblowers or second hand to fathom their credibility. This habitually leads to the pointer that whistleblowers who supplicate that suite evidence and passage has been separated that would know for certain their claims are age bracket claims that can't be deceptive (as in Karl Popper's 'falsifiablitiy tabloid) and accordingly one moves out of the scientific ring voguish the ring of consign. In disagree, this pointer can be turned on its head at the same time as it is a belongings of consign to infer that a guiltlessly unbiased scientific market can be second hand in a area twisted by national assure processes but suite evidence and passage is separated or untouched. This is an fault-finding market feature that whistleblower testimonies force researchers to due, albeit taking into consideration engorge qualm as evidenced by Dr Randle's critique. I excluding thank Dr Randle for carriage his critique and caring me an motivate to door, and explain the truth of my exopolitical regularity to whistleblower describe.In treatyMichael Salla
Occasionally I find myself in extremely odd circumstances due to the nature of my interests. Recently I found myself in the middle of an argument between one of the real time abductees I have been writing about and one of her longtime friends who is an avid UFO enthusiast.
The exchange between the abductee and the enthusiast took place while we were out to lunch at a crowded beach front restaurant on the ocean side of Long Island New York. The lunch had been a peaceful lovely afternoon enjoying a delicious meal overlooking a beautiful blue sky over a sandy beach and blue ocean. The conversation had been of vacation plans, family as well as a long talk about the Long Island serial killer who still is loose and wandering our Island roadways.
I excused myself from the table for a few minutes to call my home and walked out to the open veranda that wrapped around the restaurant to use my cell phone. I was only gone a few minutes and was surprised to return to the two friends in a heated debate concerning war between aliens and humans. Since I was not there when the discussion began I have no idea how the subject even got started. I sat down and listened as the abductee and enthusiast had one of the strangest conversations I ever heard two friends have.
The enthusiast was angry and telling the abductee that the day will come when aliens will attack the human race to use us for fuel, or food, or slaves ( the enthusiast was a bit all over the place with the reasons for the alien attack ) and it was only time before this happened and the outcome would be our doom.
The abductee sat there stone faced listening to her friend with such intensity I thought steam was going to rise from her head. I sat silently trying to figure out how to get out of this mess! In the mean time I tried to disappear in to my chair.
The enthusiast went on to describe a war of the world's resulting in combat around the globe between aliens and humans. Occasionally the abductee would mutter, "that is ridiculous' however her friend continued on with her long passionate description of a very movie like soon to come world war of aliens flying low above the earths surface while humans try to defend against them with the weapons we currently have available to us. The abductee allowed her friend to continue this huge involved story of her idea of an alien / human war without interruption. Now and then she would laugh or shake her head but let her friend spill her guts about the entire concept.
I have either read or heard over the different media airways all the things the enthusiast was saying and knew this theory was widely discussed with those interested in the UFO alien subject. I also know the abductee and wanted to dissolve in to my chair as I knew she was going to blast her friend and her ideas concerning her interpretation of a war of the worlds.
The enthusiast talked endlessly about how mankind may soon find they are going to be forced to fight invading alien forces in a fight over who will control earth. She talked about how mankind will fight using all our newest weapons during long tedious battles with alien forces who want to overtake and use the human species for food or fuel or slaves. She talked about how only the humans who go underground will remain to fight off the invading aliens forces. She went on to describe how the fight will end by way of the humans fighting the aliens in gorilla style tactics including sneaking up on alien crafts using balloons to lift them into their interiors where the human warriors will be able to overtake and destroy the alien forces. She talked as if in a hypnotic state how a small group of the human warriors would in this manner defeat the aliens and return to build a new human race upon the earth. This is the point where the abductee could no longer maintain her reaction and burst out laughing at her enthusiast friend's fantasy scenario of an alien/human conflict of war.
The abductee shook her head in amazement and asked her friend if she was serious or pulling her leg with such nonsense? Her friend immediately became insulted and defensive. The abductee sat looking at her friend as if she was the strangest thing she had ever seen and finally said:"Ok I cannot let you walk around thinking something so ridiculous as it seems to have gotten out of hand and you seem to be lost in the fantasy and confusion of the paranormal that seems to be prevalent in our society.
"First of all you need to understand that sadly in our society things we consider paranormal, or supernatural or unknown are simply things mankind has not yet figured out or understand. A huge problem with the subjects we consider unknowns are that we have completely combined confused and destroyed our own thinking about these subjects with fiction and fantasy. Science fiction is not paranormal, horror movies about sexy vampires become confused with reality while reality is lost to the fantasy of Hollywood. Star Wars was a great movie however reality is that it is doubtful all life forms in our universe could sit together in a bar sharing a drink simply due to the simple fact of atmosphere differences.Humans have built a cute little comfy world where they live in fantasy about many unknowns. I realize it is one way to deal with that which we do not understand however I also think it is just going too far. Here I sit listening to you rattle off pure fantasy as fact and you're doing it with a straight face."
The enthusiast was not happy and started to interrupt her abductee friend to defend her position on alien- human warfare. The abductee would not have it and told her friend to sit and listen as she had to her long rant on the war of the worlds.
"The view you have of this conflict is absolutely childish. Do you truly believe that beings that are advanced enough to visit us in the manner they do with ease and obvious control over the situation would have to physically fight with us? Do you really think that if they wanted to take, use or have anything at all more than they do now from us they would need to have to fight us for it? Do you seriously think the advanced beings that visit us would need to become involved with us in any type of war event? "
The abductee was obviously annoyed with her longtime friend and her UFO enthusiast friend was showing signs of anger with the abductee's questions. The enthusiast tried to defend her thinking by launching into a memorized scenario once again about mankind in hand to hand combat with invading alien forces. The abductee raised her hand abruptly stopping her enthusiast friend from continuing her rant. The abductee spoke:
"Stop, this nonsense- I had no idea you became so confused between what is logical and probable and what is fantasy. You are lost in the delusion of fiction that has been developed through fear of those who are in need of that kind of fantasy in order to digest the UFO situation on earth. You have given over to science fiction as fact and have started to believe the nonsense that flows from Hollywood and our TV providers. "
"Look chances are if the beings who visit this planet and abduct some humans for specimen study wanted to control or inhabit this earth they would have done it long ago. If the beings who are here wanted more from us they would have taken it long ago when we were even more defenseless than we are now. If those watching us wanted to help us they would have done so before we were able to do so much damage to our own kind. If their purpose was our welfare they would have openly interfered, helped, taken us over or whatever theory exists concerning these things- long ago. They are here for their own reasons and -we simply are not as important to them as we think we are. The great human delusion is that this planet and the primitive earthlings living on it are somehow of great importance to the other life forms that exist and view or visit us as they traverse this enormous universe. "
"First of all there are billions of planets around billions of stars in billions of galaxies. Our little planet may be important to us but it is doubtful it is of any great importance to our cosmic neighbors. Mankind has placed a huge amount of importance on the alien human relationship. Mankind seems to think we are very sort after and of huge concern to our visitors. I am confused at this thinking as we have obviously been shown that is not the case. Our visitors do not care to be known to us on a global scale. If that was their wish we would know it. All they would need to do is make a worldwide sighting visible over highly populated areas to be known to mankind. Instead they do not seem to care if they are at times seen or not. As it stands we do nothing but act like fools when we do see them. I do not think we are a concern to them. The most we do is make another movie or TV show to entertain us. Nothing more is done about their visits and they know it. Humans have a few quirks that make it easy to keep them in the dark. Humans have selective hearing, thinking and comprehension. Humans only hear, think about or form opinions on the selective material that fits in with what they want life and the world around us to be. Facts or real science are often ignored or denied as it does not fit in with the delusion the human population needs to deal with things they do not understand. It is most likely our greatest fault and what keeps us locked as the dummies of the universe. This quirk keeps us locked in bad scenarios across the globe and locked in the dark with issues we should have long ago solved. The UFO subject is one of those areas".
"We continue to kill each other, suffer through natural disasters and in many areas on this planet starve or die from disease. I think if our visitors wanted to take us over or help us they could and would have done so by now. They do watch us, they do use some of us but their interest in the human species seems limited."
"But please let us get back to your thinking about war with aliens. This fantasy by my fellow humans is disturbing to me.How we ever got lost in this fantasy that we would ever be able to fight aliens is beyond me. What is worse is that we have groups of people lost in this delusion that we could not only fight but could become road warrior hero's combating and taking on aliens by crawling in to their ships and winning by way of hand to hand combat. This childish nonsense coming from grown adults frightens me far more than the idea of a war of the worlds! If we are this limited in our thinking about things unknown we are in deep dark trouble."
"If aliens wanted to take over this planet they would do so in a matter of moments. I am sure it would be a simple matter of using technology closer to the Haarp projects that we are beginning to understand. If they wanted to control us they would render us helpless by using a technology that would either take over our ability to think clearly enabling them to order us about or simply completely control us in a manner without involving any combat at all. They would of course be able to completely destroy all life on this planet if they so desired by pushing a button from far above the earth's surface. In fact they could wipe us out, disinfect or decontaminate our planet all from miles above the surface or maybe the dark side of our moon. To think they would even need to fly around in any form of combat at all is really silly. The fact that this has not happened so far makes me a firm believer it will not happen any time soon. I am afraid the guerrilla warfare between cave dwelling earthlings and aliens will have to remain where it belongs, in the movies."
At this point in the lunch date I sat silently between the angry friends knowing that opening my mouth would surely be a very foolish thing to do. The abductee sat glaring at her friend. The enthusiast friend sat with eyes filled with tears. Finally the enthusiast started to cry. She was angry and snarled at the abductee:
"Well you have taken away all hope with your views now haven't you? At least thinking we could fight gives us all some hope. In your mind it is just death."
This seemed to make the abductee far angrier than she was before. She immediately stopped her friend from continuing with her tearful objections.
"Look, the only one here who has no hope is you and those who think like you. In your thinking the only way we can deal with a conflict with other beings is with war. Did it ever occur to you that you and those who think like you can only dream up fighting and killing and war as the result of a human alien contact? It seems unless we talk about how the alien beings should be here to help us and give us technology we then jump to how we would fight them. We are savage self-centered beings. We only seem concerned about what we can get from our visitors and if that is not possible how we can kill them"..
"I think what we need is to focus on what we need to do to become interesting and respected by other life forms so they will one day look at us as more than specimens or primitive beings. Who would want to be involved with primitive creatures like humans who spend most of our time in wars killing and over taking each other? Who would want to become involved with a planet where its inhabitants are constantly in conflict with each other? Look at this planet and look at how some of us have food shelter and medical care while others are starving, children dying and forced to live in savage circumstances. What do you think those who watch us think when we build bombs and use them on each other? How about the fact we kill due to the fact we are too stupid to figure out our energy requirements. Do you really think other beings who are far more advanced want anything to do with us other than what they do now? Maybe one day when we have our own act together and grow past being selfish killing machines we may be more interesting to those around us. For now we are primitive and violent. Until we understand that fact we need not worry about fighting fictional wars with those who could wipe us out with a sneeze."
The enthusiast did something next that really surprised me. She stood up and snarled at the abductee: "Well the things you want to happen are never going to happen and - I think you are ridiculous. ". Quickly the abductee asked the enthusiast: " Why is that ridiculous,why are those things not going to happen?" The enthusiast snickered back: "That is all just too hard and will never happen." With that she stood up and announced she was leaving and walked away. The abductee and I were left sitting at the table as well as holding the bill for lunch!
I only noticed after the enthusiast walked away from the table that the people around us had all been listening to the exchange between the two friends and the strange subject of an alien /human conflict. I could tell by the silence that things had been said that gave many sitting there eating lunch insight to things they ordinarily would not think about. I also know the abductee had spoken hard cold truth about these subjects and realized by way of the enthusiast's convoluted thinking how far we have drifted from logical thinking due to confusion and combining of science fiction fantasy with what is more likely the hard cold facts of advanced science and our less advanced understanding of it.
One day I hope, without being vaporized or harmed, we do come to the real truth and understanding of what lies beyond our limited thinking and knowledge of all the subjects we now consider unknowns. I must say I agree fully with the abductee on the subjects discussed at this luncheon. I also found it very disheartening that the UFO enthusiast felt our dealing with being human without war or our path towards ending things like starvation, disease and energy problems on earth as " Never going to happen or just too hard" a sad statement and one I hope that we all need to think about. For now this experience like many others I have had with the paranormal world and our thinking about it cements the fact we remain lost in the dark ages when it comes to the subjects we consider unknown!
Chris Holly
Chris Holly's Paranormal World
http://endlessjrny.blogspot.com/2012/07/humans-against-aliens-abductee-and-ufo.html Copyright (c)email chrisholly61@yahoo.com
Posted: February 10, 2008
Date: Week of Splendid 5, 2007 Time: Deceased evening/early sunup (?)
Situation of Sighting: Kootenay Department. Illustration of witnesses: 1 Illustration of objects: 1, maybe better. Exemplar of objects: ?
Unbroken Translation of event/sighting: In the standard of the night, sometime in the week of Splendid 5th, I saw a earsplitting star in the southeast, punch out of the boring. But as I scanned about better towards the west when I saw a star-like light, but it looked touch on as if it speed absolutely amid one shaft goodbye one way, and extra off in extra lane. I couldn't rehearse right away what happened amid the pieces, if they disappeared or what, but the simple shaft had traveled from the south, northward practically swiftly. At time it looked be in love with grant may well swallow been better than the one light emitting from it. It moved practically string, and concoct of slowed down and touch on "danced" when it came plain-spoken to other stars. Whether it continued to lead north after the spot somewhere I may well no longer see it, I don't order. It was high ample up that it was fainter when it approved by atmospheric humid parts of the sky. It was extremely unsteady to article, I don't mull over it may well swallow been a satellite due to the speed it traveled. I don't order about the fortune of a space station having the status of I don't order to a great extent about them. It was extremely ghostly and didn't act be in love with most natural activities up grant. It didn't act be in love with a meteor would, but most likely. Would any person order what this would be.
Thank you to the demonstration for the report.
Brian Vike, Expert HBCC UFO Research. email: hbccufo@telus.net Website: http://www.hbccufo.org http://www.brianvike.com, http://www.hbccufo.com, http://www.hbccufo.net HBCC UFO Research International: http://www.hbccufointernational.org/
The same hard sell your labor amid HBCC UFO Research, all promotion column go manage to a new charge free UFO reporting hotline.
Show up on how to Advertising On The HBCC UFO Research Website, Relations TV show & Newsletters. *Advertising On The HBCC UFO Research Website, Relations TV show & Newsletters*
Relations show numerous for the Vike Check, onlooker concerning their experiences. *The Vike Check Bystander UFO Relations Show*
No more than added, the Vike Check Relations TV show Blog. You can observe the blog out for archived radio shows and all the new and potential programs I do. *Vike Check Relations TV show Blog*
HBCC UFO Research, Box 1091 Houston, British Columbia, Canada - VOJ 1ZO
VIRGIN GALACTIC SPACESHIP CRASHES, KILLING 1 PILOT
USA TODAY
- 3 minutes ago
In the second commercial space disaster this week, Virgin Galactic's tourism rocketship exploded and crashed Friday after a malfunction during a test flight over the Mojave Desert, killing one pilot and seriously injuring the other.The Virgin Galactic Crash and the Risks of Space TourismBusinessweekWill Virgin SpaceShipTwo crash set back space tourism?BBC NewsFeatured:Virgin Galactic SpaceShipTwo CrashPOPSUGARTrending on Google+:One person dead as Virgin Galactic's SpaceShipTwo rocket plane crashes on...The GuardianIn Depth:Ship for Space Tourists Crashes, 1 Pilot Reported Dead; Second Failure in WeekBloombergWikipedia:2014 Virgin Galactic crash
VIRGIN GALACTIC SPACESHIP EXPLODES, KILLING 1 PILOT
Michael Winter and Charisse Jones, USA TODAY 4:53 p.m. EDT October 31, 2014(Photo: KABC TV via AP) 3288 CONNECT 530 TWEET 41 LINKEDIN 48 COMMENTEMAILMOREIn the second commercial space disaster this week, Virgin Galactic's tourism rocketship exploded and crashed Friday after a malfunction during a test flight over the Mojave Desert, killing one pilot and seriously injuring the other.
A witness said the SpaceShipTwo blew up shortly after its engine fired when it was dropped from the WhiteKnight aircraft that carried it aloft, the Associated Press reported. Wreckage was scattered over a wide area near Cantil, in Kern County.
The pilot ejected and was taken to a hospital, but the co-pilot suffered fatal injuries, the Kern County Sheriff's Office reported. Their identities were not immediately released.
Virgin Galactic, owned by British billionaire Richard Branson, said the craft "suffered a serious anomaly resulting in the loss of the vehicle." The malfunction was not immediately identified.
The test flight was conducted by Scaled Composites, Virgin Galactic's partner. The weather was clear, and winds were light at time of the crash, according to AccuWeather meteorologists.
Friday's flight was the 35th time SpaceShipTwo had been released by the mothership and was flying independently.
Branson has been developing the suborbital SpaceShipTwo at Mojave Air and Space Port, northeast of Los Angeles.
He said on Twitter he was "flying to Mojave immediately to be with the team."
"Thoughts with all @virgingalactic & Scaled, thanks for all your messages of support," he tweeted.
AMERICA'S MARKETSSpaceShipTwo crash costs Virgin GalacticHe told USA TODAY in 2011 that he envisioned Virgin Galactic expanding from suborbital to orbital travel and even flights between continents that could be done in a fraction of the time they take by airplane.
Made of carbon composites, SpaceShipTwo was about twice a large as its prototype predecessor, SpaceShipOne. It was 60 feet long with a cabin diameter of 90 inches, about the size of a Falcon 900 executive jet without a floor. In addition to two pilots, it was designed to carry six passengers.
"The spaceship can be thought of as an air launched glider with a rocket motor and a couple of extra systems for spaceflight," the company says.
Virgin Galactic is owned by Branson's Virgin Group and Aabar Investments PJS of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Seats for future flights cost 250,000, prepaid.
SpaceShipTwo is one of several spacecraft owned by New York-based Virgin Galactic, a unit of privately held Virgin Group. The company also owns the mothership WhiteKnightTwo - which Branson christened Eve, after his mother - and LauncherOne, an orbital launch vehicle.
The loss of SpaceShipTwo comes on the heels of the explosion late Tuesday of an unmanned commercial resupply rocket seconds after liftoff at NASA's facility on the Eastern Shore of Virginia.
An image from video shot by KABC TV in Los Angeles shows wreckage of what is believed to be SpaceShipTwo on Oct. 31 in California's Mojave Desert. The space tourism rocket exploded during a test flight. (Photo: KABC TV via AP)end quote from:
VIRGIN GALACTIC SPACESHIP CRASHES, KILLING 1 PILOT
ONE HAS TO WONDER IF RUSSIA IS UP TO IT'S OLD TRICKS AGAIN LIKE DURING THE COLD WAR WHERE SPIES BLEW UP OUR SPACECRAFT OFTEN THEN SECRETLY. ALTHOUGH TO BE HONEST THE U.S. OFTEN DID THE SAME THING DURING THE COLD WAR TO BE REALISTIC.
TO GET THE MOST INFORMATION ABOUT THIS I WOULD RECOMMEND CLICKING THE WORD BUTTON SEVERAL LINES ABOVE THIS ONE:
Credit: mysteries-and-strangeness.blogspot.com
They hover in close formation against the backdrop of a cloudy Kent sky. The two mysterious bright lights were photographed on January 6 floating over Chatham. Less than a week later four similar lights were seen over Essex, shining brightly against the dawn. The remarkable sightings were made just 30 miles apart in an area now dubbed the country's UFO hotspot. The first image was captured by Ernestas Griksas, 21, who was taking a picture of a cherry-picker outside his home in Chatham at around 1pm."Unexplained: These two bright discs were seen over Chatham in Kent on January 6"
"Double trouble: A week later these four glowing discs were seen 30 miles away in the sky over Essex"When he looked at the image afterwards he saw the bright disc-shaped objects.He told the Sun: 'There are two white discs I can't explain. I'm nowhere near a flightpath. One is slightly fainter as if it is further away or going at a different speed.'The second sighting came last Friday at 7am when car salesman Josh Cummins spotted four bright objects in the sky as he drove to work through Loughton, in Essex.
Mr Cummins, 21, told the newspaper: 'I nearly crashed. I stopped to take this picture with my mobile. It was like the UFOs were surfing the clouds. They were there for 15 seconds then vanished.'I wasn't a believer in UFOs but this made me think again.'UFO fanatics will no doubt lay claim to the sightings as evidence to support their theories of alien life.Expert Nick Pope said: 'Assuming the images are genuine, they're interesting, though the smaller objects (in the first picture) weren't seen at the time, which raises the possibility of some glitch with the camera.'As for the large one, I'm not sure. It might be some sort of atmospheric plasma phenomenon, but it's difficult to say.He added: 'The South-East does seem to be a hotspot at present. I'm not sure why.'One possibility is that it's a self-fulfilling prophesy, where one media report smokes out more from the same area.'Another is that it's a consequence of population density as there are more potential witnesses if there's anything odd in the sky.'
Both sightings were about 75 miles, as the crow flies, from Rendlesham Forest, in Suffolk, which became known as the UK's Roswell after a group of servicemen went into the forest to investigate some mysterious lights and came out convinced they had seen seen an alien spacecraft.Meanwhile, TV presenter Chris Evans reported an unexplained sighting yesterday. He tweeted: 'Approx 40 mins ago went out to walk the dog. Something passed overhead - alight, too low for a shooting star and then disappeared. Berkshire.'
He added: 'Looked too fast for a Chinese Lantern. Hope it was something exciting.'Sightings of strange objects in the sky are often explained away as aircraft, reflections in camera lenses, satellites, flares and ball lightning, among other phenonmena.Source
